Skip to main content
SearchLoginLogin or Signup

Bibliography

Published onJun 30, 2022
Bibliography

Agassi, J. (1976). Review of against method. Philosophia, 6, 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02383263

Allais, M. (1953). Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et axiomes de l’école Américaine. Econometrica : journal of the Econometric Society, 21(4), 503–546. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907921

Ariely, D. (2008). Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions. Harper Perennial.

Barrett, J. (2000). Exploring the natural foundations of religion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(1), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01419-9

Blainey, G. (1988). The causes of war. Free Press.

Bostrom, N. (2013). Existential risk prevention as global priority. Global Policy, 4, 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12002

Boudry, M. (2016). Illusies voor gevorderden. Uitgeverij Polis.

Braeckman, J. (2017). Valkuilen van ons denken. Een hoorcollege over de kracht van kritisch denken. Home Academy.

Braeckman, J., & Boudry, M. (2011). De ongelovige Thomas heeft een punt. Houtekiet.

Casler, K., & Kelemen, D. (2008). Developmental continuity in teleo-functional explanation: Reasoning about nature among Romanian Romani adults. Journal of Cognition and Development, 9(3), 340–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248370802248556

Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7

Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange (J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby, Eds.; pp. 163–228). Oxford University Press.

Darwin, C. (1958). The autobiography of Charles Darwin 1809-1882 (N. Barlow, Ed.). W.W. Norton & Company. (Original work published 1887)

Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford University Press.

Dawkins, R. (1986). The blind watchmaker. W. W. Norton & Company.

De Cruz, H., & De Smedt, J. (2007). The role of intuitive ontologies in scientific understanding – the case of human evolution. Biology \& Philosophy, 22, 351–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-006-9036-8

De Regt, H., & Dooremalen, H. (2008). Wat een onzin! Wetenschap en het paranormale.

De Regt, H., & Dooremalen, H. (2015). Het snapgevoel: Hoe de illusie van begrip ons denken gijzelt.

Dilthey, W. (1989). Introduction to the human sciences. Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1883)

Dooremalen, H. D. R., H., S., & M. (2021). Exploring humans: Philosophy of science for the social sciences – A historical introduction.

Erickson, T. D., & Mattson, M. E. (1981). From words to meaning: A semantic illusion. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 20(5), 540–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90165-1

Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.

Feyerabend, P. (1970). Against method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. University of Minnesota Press.

Fischhoff, B. (1975). Hindsight is not equal to foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 288–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.1.3.288

Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1977). Knowing with certainty: The appropriateness of extreme confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 552–564. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.3.4.552

Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Adaptive thinking: Rationality in the real world. Oxford University Press.

Gilovich, T., Tversky, A., & Vallone, R. (1985). The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences. Cognitive Psychology, 17(3), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(85)90010-6

Gladwell, M. (2005). Blink: The power of thinking without thinking. Little, Brown and Co.

Goldacre, B. (2008). Bad science. Fourth Estate.

Hacking, I. (1995). The looping effects of human kinds. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 351–394). Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.

Haselton, M., & Buss, D. (2000). Error management theory: A new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.1.81

Hook, S. (1959). Psychoanalysis, scientific method, and philosophy a symposium. New York University Press.

Johnson, D. (2004). Overconfidence and war: The havoc and glory of positive illusions. Harvard University Press.

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1985). Evidential impact of base rates (D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky, Eds.; pp. 153–160). Cambridge University Press.

Kelemen, D. (2003). British and American children’s preferences for teleo-functional explanations of the natural world. Cognition, 88(2), 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00024-6

Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.

Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(11), 2098–2109. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098

Malkiel, B. (2003). A random walk down Wall Street: The time-tested strategy for successful investing. W.W. Norton.

Norenzayan, A. (2013). Big gods: How religion transformed cooperation and conflict. Princeton University Press.

Okasha, S. (2002). Philosophy of science: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.

Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. Norton.

Popper, K. R. (1963). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. Routledge & K. Paul.

Proust, M. (1949). A la recherche du temps perdu. Gallimard.

Raiffa, H. (2002). Negotation analysis: The science and art of collaborative decision making. Harvard University Press.

Sagan, C. (1980). Cosmos. Random House.

Singer, P. (1993). How are we to live? Ethics in an age of self-interest. Oxford University Press.

Sokal, A. (1996a). A physicist experiments with cultural studies. Lingua Franca, 6(4), 62–64.

Sokal, A. (1996b). Transgressing the boundaries: Toward a transformative hermeneutics of quantum gravity. Social Text, 46(47), 217–252. https://doi.org/10.2307/466856

Sperber, D., & Mercier, H. (2017). The enigma of reason. A new theory of human understanding. Allen Lane & Harvard University Press.

Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations. Doubleday & Co.

Tomasello, M. (2009). Why We Cooperate. MIT Press.

Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 19–136). Oxford Univ. Press.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science (New York, N.Y.), 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychol. Rev, 90, 4. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.90.4.293

Vlerick, M. (2019). De tweede vervreemding: Het tijdperk van de wereldwijde samenwerking. Lannoo.

Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416717

Comments
0
comment

No comments here

Why not start the discussion?